Clicking on the smh homepage this morning and what do I see?
I couldn't help but think that if it had been an Australian swimmer as opposed to French and German swimmers, there would be outrage over a "stolen" title or some such crap.
Instead, they're "sulking" and "blaming" others.
Look, I don't doubt that the swimsuits that are used by a hell of a lot of professional swimmers give an additional advantage - so why not make it a standard requirement?
In this day and age professional sports people are generally sponsored by large corporations who can afford to supply them with these expensive suits. Sport has such a high profile that even those participants who don't have major companies backing them could still raise a decent amount of money to afford the suit.
Or, I dunno, get a job like everyone else.
The point is, articles like the one in the smh do not help things when a double-standard is applied. Australia is considered to be a "sports mad" nation, but surely we have a bit of compassion for those sports people who don't have such massive support behind them.
A win when the playing field isn't even to begin with isn't a genuine win. It is an empty one. And no amount of disparagement of your competitors is going to make it anything more.
Saturday, 26 April 2008
*eyeroll*
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

2 reasons to click here:
I agree man. How is it super fast suits are not a cheat anymore than drugs are?
The whole point of no artificial aids is to let poorer athletes compete on a level field.
Remember the Munich games? The man-women should have been a clue things were wrong. Actually they were, LA was when they started getting serious about it.
Post a Comment